Archive for the ‘marine mammals’ Category

Sonar and strandings

Monday, December 28th, 2009

by Hilary L. Maybaum

Why do mass strandings of marine mammals happen? Researchers have been trying to answer this question scientifically for decades. Various hypotheses have been put forth, from parasitic diseases to anomalies in Earth’s magnetic field. Now, manmade sonar can be added to that list.

Sonar—an acronym for SOund Navigation And Ranging—is the technique of using sound propagation to navigate, communicate, or detect underwater objects. Originally deployed on a massive scale during World War I for enemy submarine detection, sonar has since become a mainstream navigation and fish-finding aid for military, commercial, and recreational vessels alike. It relies on variations in underwater sound speed, determined mainly by temperature, pressure, and salinity (saltiness). There are two kinds of sonar systems. Passive sonar simply “listens,” without transmitting any sound. Active sonar—such as that used in fish-finding—emits sound pulses, sometimes called pings, for detection of objects. The pulses can vary in frequency, loudness, and duration.

I actually did my Master’s Thesis on the effects of an active 3.3 kHz sonar systems on humpback whales in Hawaii. A group of sonar engineers in Massachusetts had a National Geographic grant to test a prototype system on its detection of humpback whales in Stellwagon Bank. They were getting lousy results, mostly because of the shallowness and sound opacity in the bank’s waters. I invited them to come test their system in Hawaii, where the waters were clear and deep. They did, and I investigated the behavioral effects of their system on the whales. It turned out there were some observable effects, and we all concluded it was not a plausible system to use for this purpose.

But I digress. This post is about beaked whales.

Cuvier's beaked whale

Public domain image of a Cuvier's beaked whale from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

In 2005, a group of scientists studied a mass stranding of beaked whales off the Canary Islands and found lesions apparently induced by mid-frequency sonar sounds. Previously, other scientists had suggested a link between mass stranding of beaked whales and mid-frequency sonar, but were unable to establish a causal relationship. This particular stranding event of 14 whales occurred about four hours after the onset of an international naval sonar exercise conducted between the coast of Fuerteventura Island and 40 km offshore.

Postmortem examinations of the whales found no external trauma or bruising, with the exception of one postmortem shark bite. No pre-existing health issues were indicated. The researchers did, however, find severe internal hemorrhaging, swelling, and congestion in the head and neck areas, including the jaws, ears, and brain. They also found evidence of nitrogen supersaturation (“the bends”) in the blood vessels and tissues of vital organs. Beaked whales are known for their deep diving capabilities, and don’t normally get the bends unless their dive behavior is dramatically altered (see this press release from Peter Tyack’s group at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution).

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) sued the Navy over the use of mid-frequency sonar after this and similar findings were published. I’m interested in finding out where that lawsuit stands.

Update: The lawsuit was settled this time last year, in favor of the Navy. A precedent had already been set by the Supreme Court. According to a 12/29/08 NY Times article:

…in a ruling on a council lawsuit challenging the Navy’s sonar training exercises off Southern California, the Supreme Court ruled that military training trumped protecting whales.

Chief Justice Roberts wrote that forcing the Navy to deploy an inadequately trained antisubmarine fleet would jeopardize the safety of the fleet. He also wrote that it was unclear how many marine mammals the Navy’s sonar exercises might harm.


Many thanks to Dr. Joseph Mobley for sending me the original article on the mass stranding event from Vet Pathol 42:446-457 (2005).

Thanks also to Mary Beckman (@sciwriter) for the update on the Navy’s lawsuit.

  • Share/Bookmark

Acid oceans may alter marine mammal messaging

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

by Hilary L. Maybaum

I already knew that carbon dioxide affects the pH level of seawater, and that increased levels of dissolved CO2 could therefore cause the oceans to become more acidic by lowering seawater’s pH. While writing a book on climate change, I learned that ocean acidification is already happening in response to increased levels of atmospheric CO2; that is, the ocean can no longer buffer itself in response to global climate change with natural acid-base (chemical) reactions. Further, ocean acidification can, in turn, dissolve the tests (shells or exoskeletons) of crustaceans, corals, and other critters that depend on calcium carbonate for their bodily protection.

What’s news to me—and bad news at that—is how ocean acidification can also affect the transmission of underwater sound. According to recent articles in Science Daily and in Scientific American, scientists at my alma mater, SOEST at the University of Hawaii, and a scientist at my dream institute, California’s MBARI, found that ocean acidification lowers the ability of seawater to absorb low-frequency sound. In other words, increased CO2 levels make the ocean more transparent to sounds with frequencies up to about 5,000 Hz.

Dolphins, killer whales, humpback whales, blue whales, and scores of other marine mammals rely on the clear transmission of underwater sound to communicate with each other in the wild. They already deal with continuous low-frequency noise from waves and whitecaps. They also contend with constant low-frequency noise from anthropogenic (manmade) sources such as daily ocean traffic—ships, barges, and the like— as well as tourist and recreational activities. [I'm not even going to get into the cacaphony of naval testing of low-frequency sonar and explosives in this post.] I and others have found behavioral effects associated with increased noise levels and changes in existing underwater sounds. My colleagues have referred to some of these effects as whales “running away with their fins covering their earholes.” Of course, my esteemed colleagues exaggerate, but you get the idea.

Think of a beautiful house high on a hill, overlooking a long stretch of sandy, white beach. When you go to sleep, you are lulled by the gentle sounds of ocean waves hitting the shore. Now imagine that someone decides to put a superhighway between your house and the coast. You can no longer hear the ocean waves because of the traffic noise. That’s the kind of acoustical interference we are talking about. What happens when marine mammals can’t get their messages across because the cruise ships are louder, the jet skis are deafening, and breaking waves are giving them headaches? Will they run away, adapt, or die?

  • Share/Bookmark

Plastic is like poison to marine life

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

by Hilary L. Maybaum

I have seen sperm whales from the air in Hawaii, and they are awesome to behold. Odd-looking, with their huge rectangular heads and wrinkled bodies, but awesome nonetheless. It breaks my heart to learn now that ingesting plastic was the cause of death for seven sperm whales in Italy.

Plastic bags floating in the ocean can resemble marine organisms, such as jellyfish and squid. We’ve known for some time that this is a problem for sea turtles—especially leatherbacks, as jellies are their favorite food item (see this Science Daily article and this page from the National Academies Press). Sperm whale diets, on the other hand, consist mainly of squid, which are eaten whole. Nothing like a nice plastic bag resembling a large cephalopod to tempt one’s pelagic appetite, eh?

Young sperm whale

Young sperm whale - public domain photo from U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

So, good readers, here is my Christmas-Eve plea to you: Stop using plastic bags. BYO non-plastic bags when you shop, or request paper. Let’s do our nektonic friends a favor and refrain from killing them with plastic. They may be out of sight, but let’s not keep them out of mind.

  • Share/Bookmark

HIHWNMS – more than a mouthful

Monday, December 21st, 2009

It stands for Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary, and it’s a government agency under NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association. NOAA is, by the way, one of my all-time favorite government organizations, so don’t put it down, okay?

The sanctuary was established in 1992 to protect humpbies and their habitat in Hawaii. It currently seeks to fill sixteen—16!—seats on their Advisory Council. That’s eight primary seats and eight alternate seats. If I still lived in Hawaii I would definitely apply, but since I’m about 5,000 miles (8,000 km, or 4320 nautical miles) away, I’m going to leave these vacancies to those who are more geographically desirable. If you fit that bill and are interested in advising the HIHWNMS, visit this page immediately.

Applications are due by 31 January 2010.

  • Share/Bookmark

What do birds have to do with it?

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

Once upon a time, I studied humpback whales. My old research buddy, Adam Frankel, still does. Specifically, he is still studying whale song. I know this not because he told me, but because I just came across a Science News article with a quote from him. Quotes Adam,

[Danielle Cholewiak, a researcher for the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary based in Massachusettes,] "showed short-term acoustic interactions between males—that was the new thing."

This "new thing" is the finding that male humpbacks may respond to the vocalizations of other male humpbacks by changing their song. Which means that the old postulation about the purpose of whale song being advertisment for virility (i.e., reproductive fitness) is one line of evidence closer to validation.

What birds have to do with it is the fact that humpback song and bird song share similar characteristics. Their songs all have repeated notes, called phrases, which are arranged in themes. Bird researchers have been able to correlate song patterns with specific behaviors. Not so with whales. Still, borrowing the methodologies used by bird researchers has proven helpful in cracking the whale song enigma.

  • Share/Bookmark